Article

2015 Roundup: Advanced Zoom Compacts

>> This roundup has been replaced with a newer version - click to read it <<

While most of the cameras in this category fall within the relatively narrow $500-$800 range (with a few exceptions), products in this roundup vary quite a bit in terms of sensor size, number and type of control points, zoom range, video capabilities and built-in electronic viewfinders (or lack thereof). All of the cameras here offer some sort of zoom range, in general, less than 8x. Many are small enough to put into a pocket. In general, we only included flagship compacts from each brand.

If you're looking at a zoom compact as your next camera, maybe you're a smartphone shooter looking to take more control. You might be the seasoned pro looking for a capable pocket cam. Or maybe you're upgrading from an aging DSLR to something newer, faster and more exciting.

Whatever brings you here, you'll find cameras that are both surprisingly powerful and compact by the standards of even a couple years ago. That's because smartphones have made somewhat irrelevant smaller sensor compacts that didn't offer much of an image quality benefit over the similar-sized sensors in most phones today. The cameras in this roundup all differ in design, operation and feel, but all should be far more capable than even the best smartphones on the market today. Here are the top zoom compacts on the market today that we think are worth a look:

The majority of offerings in this category utilize 1"-type sensor, however two cameras offer even larger sensors: the Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II is built around the largest sensor of the bunch at 1.5", while the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 use a slightly smaller Micro Four Thirds chip.

On the smaller side, the two Fujifilm options use significantly smaller 2/3" sensors, while the Canon PowerShot S120 features the smallest sensor, a 1/1.7" chip. This is important because sensor size can be a major indicator of potential - particularly low light - image quality. Also, cameras with larger sensors will generally allow for much more control over depth of field.

On the following pages, you'll find what we liked and didn't like about each camera, links to our test scenes for image quality comparisons, and real-world galleries to give you a sense of how each performs outside the lab.

To further help you pick the right camera in this class, we've also created the chart below, which breaks down the equivalent aperture for each camera, as you work your way through the zoom range. Our article here explains the concept of equivalence, but at a high level all you need to know is that the lower the line is on the graph below, the blurrier the backgrounds you'll be able to get and typically, though not always, the better the overall low-light performance.

This graph plots equivalent focal length against equivalent aperture - with both axes taking sensor size into account so that they can be compared on a common basis. Equivalent focal lengths offer the same field-of-view and equivalent apertures give the same depth-of-field and similar total light capture. For more information, click here.

Buying Options

Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II
From Amazon
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
From Amazon
Fujifilm X30
From Amazon
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
From Amazon
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
From Amazon
Canon PowerShot G5 X
From Amazon

Comments

Comments

Total comments: 144
See more
moe lem

What it doesnt say here is that the lx100 makes manual photography so easy that its a pleasure even for automatic users.
Its way simpler than a dslr. And semi manual speed and aperture modes are harder to describe than use.

Jan 25, 2016*
rjgalphaphotgraphy
rjgalphaphotgraphy

If the lx 100 had a touch screen it would be a killer

Jan 6, 2016
User7198827319

Perhaps I have been unlucky. I bought the G7X in mid-May. In July the camera over-heated and turned itself off when shooting video. Canon replaced the camera, free, except that I had to pay to ship it to them. Then on Sunday (Dec. 13, unlucky date?) it refused to focus properly. This issue has "crept in" for the past few weeks, occasionally refusing to focus. I could get it to focus by focusing on different things at different distances, but that was an inconvenience, to say the least. It was mis-focusing in dim light and bright light. I returned this second G7X to Canon yesterday.

Dec 15, 2015
User7198827319

Canon quickly sent a replacement, refurbished, G7x. However, after a few weeks, it began to slow down, act "funky." I got frustrated, and called the dealer. Fortunately, Canon is cooperative to dealers; they would take back the camera for a full refund. It is also fortunate that I save the original box. I applied the refund towards a Sony RX-100 IV. So far, I like the Sony a lot.

Mar 11, 2016
Christoph v Ballmoos

In Switzerland, you get the G7X for 438 CHF (~$), and in plus get 50 CHF Cashback, so in essence less than 400$.
The RX100-4 is 850 CHF, so at least double the price.
The LX-100 is around 600 CHF. so still 1.5 x the price.

This makes the G7X a fantastic deal and especially make look all other models overpriced. Although not perfect, the G7X is a great little camera. For this type of camera, shooting RAW faster than 1 per second is really not a must. But a tiltable touchscreen is a real plus!
And yes, it is really pocketable! The LX-100 is a brick!

Dec 10, 2015*
Jack Kennealy

I pay most of my attention to the customer reviews, in which the Canon G5X outscores both the Sony and the Panasonic. I am not surprised.

Dec 8, 2015
SteveNunez
SteveNunez

The Canon G5X is listed as having a mic in port- it does not, please correct this.......I almost bought one and learned it's not actually a mic port....would have been a regrettable purchase.

Dec 5, 2015
FartIng

just got mine today - I know im being a bit thick, but the attached strap doesnt loop onto the metal hinges on either side? Can anyone help!!

Dec 1, 2015
Thomas McLean

There is a huge selection in this field and some have mentioned some that were absent and good contenders. I have several on this list and think that while good they are not quite great. What I'd like to see is the marriage of the G1XMII and the RX100Miv. I like the zoom range, touch screen, menu system and sensor size on the Canon but would like a new sensor design, speed and options of the Mark iv. I think Canon need to make the G1X line truly world class. It needs to be pushing technology on all fronts and they really aren't. Hard to say as a long time Canon fan. Sony have so much innovation in such a small size they are almost in a class of their own. That said, a camera is a very personal thing and what works for some, doesn't for others regardless of its status in the roundup.

Nov 28, 2015
Abu Mahendra

Canon had five cameras in this comparo, and still can't manage to rise to the top...

Nov 23, 2015
Jack Kennealy

If you look carefully at the Customer Reviews, I believe you'll see that the G5X did rise to the top. I pay a lot more attention to the customer reviews, because they factor in lots of things (e.g., reliability) not well covered by the dpr reviews.

Dec 8, 2015
Greenville

I stopped paying a lot of attention to customer reviews since the rise of viral marketing. Too often a lot of the people posting both positive and negative reviews don't even own the item. Amazon recently has started to try and cull such reviews. Now days its just to hard to know if the people writing the reviews are being compensated to write the reviews.

Jan 13, 2016
Michael Dbn

How can the Sony be named the "overall winner" when it has the same score as the Panasonic?

Nov 21, 2015
Chris62

Looking for the prices ...hmm.
I bought my Samsuung NX30 DX 20 MP - full equipped body even EVF with rotation possibility, touch sreen - super amoled, 9 fps, cheaper then majority of these tested compact cameras and Lightroom and lens included.and even additional lenses does not achieved RX100IV price.
I prefer this camera than these cameras and there are even cheaper as NX20 or NX300 or NX3000 or with the best sensor in price range as NX500.

I also have compact camera Panasonic LX7 - it is good camera but together with optional Viewfinder I have paid more than for this Samsung and of courseLX7 does not much to NX30 and even small zoom aspect is solveed by NX 16-50/F3,5-F5,6 PZ lens and zoom in small package was the only reason I bought LX7.

The camera market is very rich now, so the choise is difficult if we take the paremeters/price ratio into the consideration.
I think in case of compact cameras price includes very high marketing costs and customers pay for it.

Nov 20, 2015*
krisjohn

nice cam

Nov 18, 2015
chj

IMO Canon took two different steps in the wrong direction with the G5X and G9X. On paper, many of the features (size, flip touchscreen, bright aperture, etc.) of the G7X were perfect for me. However, after reading the reviews it seemed the RAW burst shooting, lens, and AF were behind the competition. So I had high hopes for Canon's next effort. But it seems they improved none of these shortcomings and instead made a camera that was too big (G5X) and a camera that was too limited (G9X). Canon, just improve the performance of the G7X so it can take full advantage of its features, it will be perfect!

Nov 16, 2015*
resorts122

Thanks for sharing this post.
Tree House Resort Ranthambore, Visit http://treehousecottages.co.in/tree-house-resort-ranthambore.php

Nov 16, 2015*
forpetessake
forpetessake

It's funny the top two winners are Sony and Panasonic, which are clearly inferior to Canons and Fujis -- just look at the provided pictures.

Nov 16, 2015
Najinsky

Or put it another way. Put a Sony M43 BSI 20MP sensor and processors into the LX100, add an ND filter and better VF, and I'll buy 20 of them to give/sell to my friends when they ask me which camera they should buy.

But for now, I pass.

Nov 15, 2015*
Najinsky

It's sad that in 2015 Canon insist on loading a near class-leading body with a class trailing sensor. I've not bought a Canon in years (5DMk2), guess I wait a few more.

The G1X2 is very capable under typical usage, but for me, the point of a camera like this (lens, sensor size, controls, features) is for when you have to take it places where larger equipment can't go. As such it will get pushed to extremes and a substandard sensor (banding and noise) will let you down after all the hard work was done.

I have similar thoughts about the Panasonic. M43 sensors reached their (imaging) Peak over 3 years ago with the OM-D but have been static since. I'd really hoped we would have seen a 20ish MP BSI (or better) M43 sensor by now.

I wouldn't put anyone off buying these cameras a their main camera, it's hard to find a bad camera these days and these all look excellent. But they all just fall a little short of ideal, suspiciously so, like the manufacturers are deliberately holding back.

Nov 15, 2015
Donglei

I do love the way dpr compares several p&s cameras with a graph of equivalent aperture and focal length. But it only appears in the camera news and later we can never find it again. Could you make such a chart tool and embed it into your comparison system? And it would be greater if dslr lenses are also included in this tool!

Nov 11, 2015
Micorriza
Micorriza

that would be the best thing ever!

Nov 11, 2015
MGJA
MGJA

And speaking of that magnificent chart - it is horribly unparsable for the partially colour blind. You can happily use black, white, red, yellow and blue. No green, no orange, no brown, no purple. If you need more, why that's why dotted lines were invented.

Nov 11, 2015
(unknown member)

A what????
Color blind taking colored photo needing to see the colored chart!!!

Nov 16, 2015
forpetessake
forpetessake

That's not very flattering to the small sensor cameras -- manufacturers will be offended. They like converting the focal lengths, but conveniently forget about the apertures.

Nov 16, 2015
(unknown member)

@forepetes: I am confused by your comment. Please explain what you mean I assume you are not referring to "pinhole" aperture or a fixed aperture camera, like disposable film cameras.

Nov 16, 2015
biza43

These are all compromised in one way or another, one just needs to choose according to one's needs. I chose the Canon G7X over the RX100IV simply because: it was a lot cheaper, and I don't need an EVF on this class of camera. The G7X does what it does very well; if you can't take decent photos with it, it is not the camera's fault.

In experienced hands, any of these cameras can take very good photos.

Nov 11, 2015
Greenville

I don't think this is a bad reason to choose a camera, but as a 30+ year Canon user I do find it disappointing that Canon now completes on price and not as a technology leader. They tend to do just good enough to get by if they discount their cameras. Main reason I did not buy a G7X is my mirroless camera does not have an EVF and I am not going to make that mistake again.

Jan 13, 2016
The Silver Nemesis
The Silver Nemesis

Another Case Study.

Nov 11, 2015
KonstantinosK
KonstantinosK

G5X: is it 28-100mm or 24-100mm?

Nov 10, 2015
Rishi Sanyal
Rishi Sanyal

Fixed. Thank you.

Nov 11, 2015
sailorman

Five Canon models - but no room for a single Nikon camera ?

What am I missing ?

Nov 10, 2015
Hachu21

There's no nikon camera in this range...
The only one could be the P340 wich is 2 years and half old.

Nov 10, 2015
5inchfloppy

There is the P7800, but probably not included since it has a 1/1.7" sensor.

Nov 11, 2015
5inchfloppy

but then again the Canon S120 is included (it has a 1/1.7" sensor) so i dunnoes lewl ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Nov 11, 2015
FodgeandDurn

I guess the S120 still seemed relevant for some reason - I have some friends who only just bought one so go figure.

If you walk into a store and ask for a good small camera at $250 chances are you'll still get pointed to an S120.

They didn't include the Canon G16, which is also the same age.

Nov 11, 2015
pacnwhobbyist

What you're missing is that Nikon hasn't offered much of anything in the enthusiast compact segment in the past couple of years. I don't know what the deal is with them. Maybe the J series is supposed to make up for that?

Nov 11, 2015
nicoboston

Surprisingly [or not], there's nothing about the build quality and the durability of these cameras. They are supposed to be "pocketable", so we should be able to take them everywhere without special precautions. I have purchased 2 "G" Canon in the past: G2 in 2001, G10 in 2008. 14 (!!!) and 7 years later, respectively, both cameras work perfectly and have only minor scratches.

In contrast, my X30 went back to Fujifilm for repair twice and has now a loose hot shoe :-(

I do not have a Sony, but I know that RX100s have quite notorious reliability and durability issues. They have certainly brilliant studio performance, however I do not live in a studio.

Sadly, reliability and durability are not even discussed in your roundup.

Nov 10, 2015
sierranvin

I have stuck with an RX100 II, preferring zoom to bokeh, which I have dragged through three continents, rough outdoor work: Kamchatka, South Africa, Iceland, Alaska, Yukon, Utah, etc. It is an extremely durable, reliable camera which I would recommend to anyone for exactly the "notorious" characteristics you are criticizing.

Nov 10, 2015
tesilab
tesilab

@sierranvin: it's a classic case of YMMV where RX100s are concerned. I had a very lightly used RX100 mk I, which I sold after not more than a year, and it just died shortly afterward. The very nicely built RX1s are apparently experiencing lens focusing failures (not mine so far).

I would strongly urge anyone buying Sonys (and I still do) to factor in the cost of a 3 year protection plan.

Nov 11, 2015
Rishi Sanyal
Rishi Sanyal

For somewhat obvious reasons, we don't, & can't, test durability.

I'll say this though: of the numerous cameras & lenses I've used, I've only ever had a couple fail on me, & I shoot waterfalls/in rain routinely. Once a Canon 5D classic died from the mist of a waterfall, & once a Nikon 70-200 F4 VR just completely crapped out (focus would rack back & forth & never stop/lock) for no apparent reason. I've doused two Sony a7R II's in tons of water, dropped a RX100 IV on concrete, had a colleague fling a RX100 III to the floor from his desk, had a friend mail me a RX100 Mark I in a simple, small USPS bubble wrap envelope, with literally no other protection, across the country - and aside from a small ding here & there, had no issues whatsoever. Even rechecked the lenses for issues - none.

My point? Experiences vary so wildly that you'll only have meaningful data if you test hundreds of every unit. Also: these devices are pretty darn robust, & you're better off worrying about other things.

Nov 11, 2015
Mike FL

Rishi Sanyal;

Why DPR does not test some feature such as RX10's weather sealing?

Nov 11, 2015
mcshan

Every camera brand has had issues.

Nov 11, 2015
Malikknows
Malikknows

This an excellent point. Also a good value for money discussion would be good.

Nov 11, 2015
RayVagh

I agree, Canon quality is always great. Today I still use Canon PSA 540 (2006) besides my latest Canon PSS SX710HS (2014).

Nov 12, 2015
nicoboston

@Rishi Sanyal
Right, obviously you cannot really test durability.
However, you do not say much about build quality either, which often relates to durability.
A far as I'm concerned, I like reading your extensive and interesting reviews. But ultimately I always go to a brick-and-mortar store and take candidate cameras in my hands...
Recently I was about to purchase a RX100 IV to replace an older compact. I have no doubt that it is -technically- an excellent tool. However, in my hands, it was relatively flimsy (lens, EVF, flash). Again I might be wrong, but it is a critical parameter IMO. My antiquated G Canon are still alive and fully functional. Although I am aware that, in 2015, Canon compact cameras are somehow "behind", their robustness is reassuring. I often have to travel with a compact only and no backup, so I want to trust the compact.

Nov 12, 2015
ChowMonkey
ChowMonkey

Just bought a LX100 because I can't get used to the ergonomics and formfactor of my RX100 III. I absolutely love the LX100 and the RX100 III therefore will be used by my kid. His "My First Sony".

Nov 10, 2015
Mike FL

Being Small could be a PRO or a CON, but the selling point of RX100s are being Small.

I replaced LX7 with RX100.M3 b/c LX100 is very poor in usability for my use just name a few:

- Can not shoot in low/[high] angle
- No build in flash
- No Build in ND filter

LX7 is a good P&S, and I bought EVF mainly for low-angle shooting as LX7's EVF can be flip up.

I still keep/use LX7 for UWA as I bought Tube adapter + UWA [+ Tele adapter] for it.

I'll replace my RX100.M3, if there is P&S can have UWA/Tele added on liking LX7.

Nov 11, 2015
ChowMonkey
ChowMonkey

Understood. It's personal favor I think.
- The EVF of the LX100 is very well implemented. So much better than the one of the Sony that I don't miss the tiltable screen on the LX100. The LX100 EVF screams "use me, use me, use me" where the Sony EVF is only good for emergencies.
- I never use flash.
- No build in ND filter is no dealbreaker for me. I never miss it.

In the end for me the LX100 is a joy to use. Extremely well implemented controls and EVF. It is a real photographers camera that matches my Fuji's in these aspects.
The RX100M3 is a compact camera. Made for point and shoot photography and not focussed on usability. The controls are fiddly and the zoomring has a terrible delay which I can't get used to. The EVF is mediocre. Good things are. Good IQ and tiltable screen.

Nov 11, 2015
Mike FL

Yes, buying a camera is a very personal choice as always.

LX100 is $200 cheaper than RX100.M3.

BTW, If users shoot high/low angle vertically [which I do not], buying a camera with fully articulated LCD liking Canon G5X, not RX100.M3/4.

I do not think LX100's control is well implemented, also I do not like the lens flare.

As well, having no auto lens cap slows down the flow; another bad usability.

Again, that's why LX100 is much cheaper than RX100.M3, imho, bad usability.

Nov 11, 2015
ChowMonkey
ChowMonkey

Did you ever try the LX100 for a few days or is your opinion based on reviews?

[Again, that's why LX100 is much cheaper than RX100.M3, imho, bad usability].

Nah, a cameraprice is not based on usability.

Nov 11, 2015*
Mike FL

The LX100's design is more than 10 years old, and it does not work for me.

BTW, the more than 10 years old LC1 has flash built in.

http://www.dpreview.com/products/panasonic/compacts/panasonic_dmclc1

It may not work very well for most of the users as $200 cheaper than RX100.M3 is an evidence. $350 cheaper than M4.

Even though, Amazon sold more M3/4 than LX100 as far as I can see.

There is sth called common sense while designing a camera which Pana is losing it.

Panasonic was very good for designing P&S, but the clock was stopped @ LX100.

Too bad, and I feel sorry for Panasonic.

Nov 11, 2015*
ChowMonkey
ChowMonkey

That is your opinion but not a fact. Many people like the proven ergonomics like on the LX100, Fuji, Leica and other rangefinder style cameras.

Not sure why you should feel sorry for Panasonic. I don't think your opinion is really a hot item on the weekly board meeting :p

[It may not work very well for most of the users as $200 cheaper than RX100.M3 is an evidence. $350 cheaper than M4.]

Most users are not into photography.

Nov 11, 2015*
Mike FL

In this industry, like all other industries, there are leaders and followers. SONY is a leader in ML and P&S, Pana and Fuji are just folowers, LX100 and FUJI Xs, from X10 to X1000, look like 60 years old Leica, but they are not Leica.

BTW, I prefer rangefinder style cameras too, and I'm waiting for a7000.

Nov 13, 2015
ChowMonkey
ChowMonkey

Sony is only leader in developing sensors. That's all. They don't do well financially.
To prefer rangefinders is personal but I do understand that preference ;)

Nov 13, 2015
Mike FL

SONY never did well financially for past 15 years. Canon is most profitable company by just looking the way Canon does for developing cameras.

I like rangefinders b/c it is low key even I do not like that the EVF is in the corner.

Nov 13, 2015
ChowMonkey
ChowMonkey

No camera division does really well :) But these companies do more than only cameras. So they'll survive.

Nov 13, 2015
Mike FL

The problem is that if making Camera becomes a very profitable business, Chinese companies will step in. just look all other consumer electronic business.

So Japaneses cameras' maker will never make sizable profits, imho.

Nov 13, 2015